November 5, 2007: This website is an archive of the former website,, which was created 10 years ago by Charles Jenks. It became one of the most populace sites in the US, and an important resource on the antiwar movement, student activism, 'depleted' uranium and other topics. Jenks authored virtually all of its web pages and multimedia content (photographs, audio, video, and pdf files. As the author and registered owner of that site, his purpose here is to preserve an important slice of the history of the grassroots peace movement in the US over the past decade. He is maintaining this historical archive as a service to the greater peace movement, and to the many friends of Traprock Peace Center. Blogs have been consolidated and the calendar has been archived for security reasons; all other links remain the same, and virtually all blog content remains intact.

THIS SITE NO LONGER REFLECTS THE CURRENT AND ONGOING WORK OF TRAPROCK PEACE CENTER, which has reorganized its board and moved to Greenfield, Mass. To contact Traprock Peace Center, call 413-773-7427 or visit its site. Charles Jenks is posting new material to, a multimedia blog and resource center.

Search site - New! Calendar - Calendar Archive
Contents - Archives - War Crimes - GI Special - Student Activism - Links

War on Truth  From Warriors to Resisters
Books of the Month

The War on Truth

From Warriors to Resisters

Army of None

Iraq: the Logic of Withdrawal

Thoughts Concerning Iraq's Unaccounted for Chemical Weapons (Thanks, Eric)

Excellent piece of work debunking the arguments for war against Iraq. As
matters are developing, however, I am quite concerned that Iraq will be
caught in the "Can't prove a negative" trap because it has lost or
destroyed records and physical evidence relating to its destruction of
certain weapons containing mustard gas, anthrax, VX gas and a few other
substances. In the end, this is an argument Bush et al. can make that
will be difficult to refute.


One focuses on two points:

1. According to several former inspectors (Scott Ritter, for example,
has written much on this), it was not disputed among the inspectors that
Iraq's ability to PRODUCE any more of these noxious substances had been
eliminated. Thus, the only risk comes from what might have been produced
before 1991 and is still out there AND STILL HARMFUL.

2. Very little, if any, of what might possibly be still out there
would not have broken down by now. I don't recall Ritter's comments on
each specific substance, but I recall fairly clearly that mustard gas
and sarin deteriorate in no more than five years.

Bottom line, I think with a little exploration along this line, you can
minimize, ideally eliminate, the force of what I believe will end up
being the only otherwise unanswerable argument in favor of war.
I hope you'll make this effort. Either way, I thank you for the effort
you've made so far.

Eric Brill

Page created December 23, 2002 by Charlie Jenks.