1. Open letter to U.S. Rep. John Olver urging him to
oppose economic sanctions against Iraq
Nine neighbors met with U.S. Representative John Olver (MA) on
Saturday, February 6th. All urged him to join the effort to end economic sanctions
against Iraq during the 2 1/2 hour meeting. Rep. Olver asked for more
information; for example, he said he had not heard of depleted
uranium. On behalf of the group, Charlie Jenks did the
research and sent him this letter with a package of the referenced
materials on March 8, 1999. We hope you find the embedded links
helpful in your research about sanctions and the continuing war against Iraq.
Several of the links to newspaper articles or editorials have expired.
Dear Representative Olver:
I am writing to follow-up on our meeting in Amherst on February 6th. First
of all, thank you for spending 2 1/2 hours with nine neighbors, representing many others
in our communities. They came to encourage you to work against the economic sanctions,
which have had a devastating effect on the Iraqi people.
You asked for some additional information and requested that we direct materials to
your assistant, Kelly Bovio. I have listed topics on which you sought information with
reference to sources and some enclosed materials. You may follow the highlighted links as
I posted this letter to the Traprock site at http://www.crocker.com/~traprock. I am
continuing to research these issues, and would bring other important information to your
attention. These are some of the issues we discussed:
- We pointed out that our government has used radiological weapons against the Iraqi
people, i.e. depleted uranium weapons. I have enclosed a few excerpts from Uranium
Battlefields Home & Abroad: Depleted Uranium Use by the U.S. Department of Defense, Citizen
Alert & Rural Alliance for Military Accountability, March, 1993. (I included part of a
report written by Dr. Joe Osterman, Director of the DOD office of Environmental and Health
Sciences.) I also included articles from the Guardian Weekly, January 10, 1999, on
reports of soaring congenital deformities in Iraq; The State, Columbia, S.C.,
August 11, 1991, on radioactive tanks and Bradley's that had to be decontaminated; and The
Wall Street Journal, July 18, 1991, on how Nuclear Metals, Inc., Concord, MA (now
Starmet) had successfully lobbied Congress to
spend $180 million to stockpile a 300 year supply of depleted uranium (the Pentagon was
asking Congress to repeal the stockpile requirement). Incidentally, depleted uranium used
during the Gulf War may have contributed to Gulf War Syndrome. (Please see a February 28,
1999 CNN report on the opening of a Centers for Disease Control conference on Gulf War
ailments).
- We told you that Denis Halliday, former UN Asst. Secretary General, had quit as UN
coordinator of the Food for Oil program in disgust in September, 1998. He had worked with
the UN for 30 years and resigned his 13-month supervision of the program in protest over
the economic sanctions, stating they were "totally bankrupt" and incompatible
with the UN charter and UN conventions on human rights and the rights of the child. He has
drawn attention to the "4,000 to 5,000 children dying unnecessarily every month due
to the impact of sanctions because of the breakdown of water and sanitation, inadequate
diet and the bad internal health situation." He has noted the grave impact on the
fabric of Iraqi society, with increased divorces, crime and street children. (Source:
Excerpts from BBC News Online 9/30/98 - http://leb.net/IAC/BBC.html.)
On February 12th several of us videotaped Mr. Halliday's address at Boston
University on this issue. I have also included an article from the New York Times,
December 28, 1998: "Iraq is a Pediatrician's Hell; No Way to Stop the Dying."
Please also see a copy of the Iraq Notebook, January 1999; the lead article is
written by Denis Halliday (other articles relate to issues raised in this letter).
- You raised an issue of whether Saddam Hussein would allow food to reach his people if
the economic sanctions were lifted. Mr. Halliday addressed this issue during an interview.
"'Albright says that she cares more for the Iraqi people than Saddam. I don't buy
that. Before and during Resolution 986 the Iraqi government was supplementing it quite
extensively, feeding orphans, widows and other single parents. In addition to 986, they're
running an extraordinarily effective programme … through some 50,000 different agents
to a country of about 18 million people. Our observers watch that process from the border
to the warehouse. It works, & we have no evidence of any significant leakage. The
system works because the Iraqis make it work. To say that they don't care about their own
people is just rubbish.'" (Source: excerpt from interview with Middle East
International (11/13/98, pp.6-7); see http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss/1998/307.html.)
- We told you that the U.S. Government is harassing Voices in the Wilderness volunteers
who have taken medicine to Iraq. You had not heard of this citizen effort; here's their
web-site - http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/.
I have enclosed a copy of the "Pre-penalty Notice" from the Office of Foreign
Assets Control, U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, OFAC Nos. IQ-162016 and IQ-162433, 12/3/98.
- We discussed how medical and other essential supplies have not been approved due to
"dual use" restrictions. Ambulances, for example, have been considered dual use
since they could theoretically be used to ferry troops. I have more research to do on
this; perhaps your staff could look into this as well. The Sanctions Committee of the UN
Security Council must approve foodstuffs, materials and supplies considered essential to
civilian needs, and materials and supplies allowed under the food for oil program.
The U.S. and the U.K. have reportedly blocked many items that have passed before this
committee. Your staff may have better access to the supporting materials than I would.
- We also discussed the flimsy reasons for the renewed bombing campaign itself. The
International Action Center web-site addresses this question well: "Neither [Richard]
Butler nor the U.S. has challenged the Iraqi Foreign Minister's allegation that since
November 17, 1998, when Iraq allowed weapons inspections to resume, there have been 427
inspections, 128 of them at new sites, and UNSCOM has cited only five so-called
obstructions…One was a 45 minute delay before allowing access. Another was a rebuff
to an outrageous demand by a U.S. arm inspector, Dianne Seamons, that inspectors be
allowed to interview all of the undergraduate students in Baghdad University's Science
Department. Another, on December 9, was the inspection of a small headquarters of the
Baathist political party. Inspectors left those premises after they were asked what is the
relation between the small headquarters of a party and the disarmament mission. The last
two cases of so-called Iraqi noncompliance were this: UNSCOM asked to inspect two
establishments on Fridays--the Muslim holy day. The Iraqis told UNSCOM that since these
establishments were not open on Friday, the inspectors could visit the establishments, but
they would need to be accompanied by Iraqi officials. This is in accordance with the
agreement between Iraq and UNSCOM about Friday inspections." (Please see http://www.iacenter.org/liesfrad.htm.)
- We reported to you that the U.S. used UNSCOM to spy on Iraq. You asked for more
information. Did you see the recent front-page article in the Times? I have enclosed a
copy of "C.I.A. Was With U.N. in Iraq for Years, Ex-Inspector Says," New York
Times, 2/23/99. The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com)
ran a story on March 2, 1999 and an on March 3, 1999 calling the spying "a shabby exploitation of the UN." No
wonder Iraq was less than fully cooperative.
- The U.S. may have manipulated weapons inspection to justify a bombing campaign. On
January 18, 1999 the U.S. News and World Report online service (http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/990118/18unsc.htm)
reported that a key UNSCOM inspection had been cancelled shortly before Richard Butler was
to report on Iraq's cooperation. "'What we didn't want,' says a U.S. official, 'was a
make-believe inspection with non-experts, after which there would be much reporting about
the great cooperation by Iraq.'" The UNSCOM team then left Iraq a day ahead of
schedule and Butler informed the U.S. of two conclusions that would latter be used to
justify bombing. Before presenting his report to the Security Council, Butler gave a
preview of the report to U.S. officials, who offered comments on it. They maintain that
the final wording was Butler's. Are we to believe this? I am dubious.
You asked what we should do if we did not have the sanctions. The group did not have
consensus on U.S./Iraq policy, except that the economic sanctions are killing the Iraqi
people and destroying its society. How about lifting the economic sanctions? As discussed
above, the Food for Oil program is not working. A lifting of the economic sanctions would
allow Iraq not only to feed its people, but to start to rebuild the infrastructure of its
society, e.g. its water system (please see David Sole's paper at http://www.iacenter.org/iraqchallenge/water.htm).
A final point concerns the current escalated bombing campaign. Why are we doing this;
is it really over enforcement of "no fly" zones? (The U.N. does not mandate
these zones; rather, solely the U.S. and the U.K. impose them). A New York Times
editorial, March 3, 1999, argues that "the White House seems to have shifted its
military strategy in Iraq to advance the goal of toppling Saddam Hussein." The Times
suggests that we are using air strikes to punish the Iraqi military in the hopes that it
will overthrow Hussein. The Times argues that the President should let the American people
and Congress know its true intent. It seems to me that the President is fighting a war
against Iraq with no authorization from Congress, no explanation to the American people
and without any mandate from the U.N.
During our meeting, you shared a letter from Representative Conyers that you had
signed; you also showed us President Clinton's response. You said that you would mail
copies to people at the meeting (we gave our addresses). I have not received anything yet.
If you do not have their addresses, I will ensure that everyone who was at the meeting
gets copies if you forward the letters to me.
Thank you for the generous amount of time and attention that you gave to these issues.
I hope that you will agree that the economic sanctions as applied to Iraq have been
ruinous to its people and society; these sanctions must end immediately. Please do
whatever you can to relieve the plight of the Iraqi people.
U.S. Representative John Olver (cener back row) with neighbors at meeting on
2/6/99.
2. Sara Weil, Intern at Traprock Peace
Center, made the following remarks to U.S. Representative John Olver (MA) during a 2 1/2
hour meeting on February 6th. Traprock organized the meeting between Rep. Olver and
9 neighbors, who encouraged him to support the lifting of sanctions against Iraq.
I’m not used to doing this. My strength is not public speaking. I
don’t express anger well in any part of my life. I internalize it. I am angry. Our government has obscured the truth about Iraq. It is difficult for American
citizens to grasp what is going on there. Real information is very hard to come by. I am
very angry at the way the media obscures, under reports and misrepresents the Iraqi
situation. I know the level of outrage among U.S. citizens would be undeniable if people
had half an idea of what has occurred.
To my eyes, the role of the government on this
issue is unimaginable. The propagation of this doctrine leaves me holding my head in my
hands for long minutes at a time. My head is in my hands now. What my conscience sees I
cannot accept. I am depressed. I am ashamed. I feel betrayed. There is true evil happening
and I feel my country and therefore myself are the evil ones and I can’t accept it.
Often I have wanted to leave this country. I don’t want to be here. I am ashamed. I have tried to imagine what would be the linchpin – the words I could say
to shake you. I know what really shook me out of my cocoon of ignorance. I had been
traveling in Australia. This was in 1993, I think, maybe 94. An Australian told me the
U.S. had used depleted uranium in the Gulf War. I was so mad at him. I told him he was
lying. He said our own soldiers were carrying these bullets tipped with depleted uranium.
The idea was unimaginable to me. Beyond my ability to even consider. It was not possible.
Then I found out that it is true. That changed me forever.
What is it for you? What will change you so that you can’t sit silent on
this issue: the many tons of depleted uranium we have left strewn about a region once
known as the fertile crescent? Are you an environmentalist? The destruction to historic
sites? Do you love history? The dying…the death of children – the most
vulnerable succumbing to the toxic conditions created by the systematic bombing of the
civic infrastructure in the Gulf War: water treatment plants, electric installations, etc.
destroyed so that the basic needs of society are unavailable perpetrating disease. And the
impossibility of repairing these under the sanctions.
Are you a humanitarian? I thank
deeply those committed people who risk their personal rights in this country to go to Iraq
and see the things they tell about so that others may know – the doctors, the clergy,
and the schoolteachers – the many respected members of our citizenry. Maybe you
should go.
What touches you? Maybe you know the history of the Middle East and Iraq since 1921 when the
lines were drawn on the map that arbitrarily imposed borders to the satisfaction of Europe
and the U.S.; and subsequently the duplicitous policies of this country that in large part
have created the politics and recent history of the region…the arrogant, the
self-serving, ill-considered, shortsighted policies. Do you know that 30% of Iraqi
children under 5 are severely malnourished leading to stunting and developmental problems
both mental and physical…That’s as bad as anywhere on Earth. Maybe a list of the
items prohibited under sanctions and of what it would mean to live like that would shake
you. Or maybe a crystal ball allowing a glimpse of the future.
Imagine this generation of
Iraqis growing up under our domination and what that has meant for them. Imagine the anger
and resentment they will bring to their adult lives. What of President Saddam Hussein? Admittedly—he is a dictator. Who,
remember, also had policies of universal health care and free education for all citizens
through university before the Gulf War meant good social conditions despite the political
repression! He killed Kurds – so does Turkey. Who has nuclear weapons in the region?
Israel. What country has invaded and occupies other nations? Israel.
It’s a joke to
say Saddam Hussein is a threat. If anything it is our policies that will create a disaster
for us in the future. The bombings have to stop. They are illegal. They are war crimes. They are
violations of international law and the UN Declaration of Human Rights. The no-fly zones
are illegal. They are an imposition of U.S. and Britain outside of the UN The no-fly zones
and the bombings are an act of war. It’s unacceptable. The sanctions are murder and
genocide. And we, the U.S. are responsible – they are U.S. imposed. The Security
Council at the UN cannot lift the sanctions when one country opposes that change. That
country is us. I hope you can show me another truth than what I see. I’m a poor voice to
be speaking to you. There are a lot of others that would be better. People who have no
faith that you are able to change our policy makers or that you are committed to that goal.
Sara Weil, Intern, Traprock Peace Center
3. The following is Sunny Miller's letter
posted shortly after the latest large-scale bombing campaign against Iraq in December,
1998 on the Non-violence web..
It is easy to feel ill-equipped to respond adequately when
the missiles have already been launched. As children we sat at small desks while the
teacher stood at the front of the room. We were rewarded for being quiet. But we are
many and greatly talented. If we put out a call to neighbors to discuss this outrageous
assault on Iraqi people they will respond.
Let's stand with a sign tomorrow at noon at your town
center! It's of some use and will give you a chance to invite neighbors for 2-way
communication is more powerful. I propose that we leaflet, chat on the street tomorrow,
make phone calls, encourage our neighbors to take heart and speak to others. By Sunday
morning we can have invitations out at most churches. By Sunday afternoon many neighbors
will be ready to gather in parish halls, in synagogues, at town halls, at High Schools, or
at the local grange. Call us if you find a location!
At every location let's pass the talking stick. Of course we will make special invitations
to those back from Iraq, to Students and professionals studying here from other countries,
and to some relevant academics. But often don't think to invite the local ROTC, National
Guard, the VFW, veterans, nursery school teachers, high school teachers, teens and mothers
on welfare.
Let us be sure to invite the whole village. Let us begin with a bit of refreshment via
pot-luck, and an open mike or free-for-all of comedic and musical response to the issues
of the day, perhaps at the entrance to the meeting hall.. Then to be sure that EVERYONE
has a chance to speak let's ring a bell and make announcements -- to begin small
discussion circles of six to twelve people.
Let's conclude with a big circle when the talking stick will pass again, with proposals
(perhaps even praise)of ALL sorts being considered. We will want to use I-statements
mainly, expressing feelings, to encourage earnest and appreciative DISCOURSE THAT IS NOT
AN ARGUMENT but that builds community. We can ask for contributions to shared
understanding rather than dumping blame. It's so easy to condemn. It's so much harder to
accept that all of us are part of the problem and all of us are part of the solution. It's
easy to forget that our response to something terrible can be magnificent. 0ur voices
matter. It's hard to accept that our generosity and our love can make a difference to
people in Iraq -- as well as with soldiers responding to orders. Great responses are
possible.
