grassrootspeace.org

November 5, 2007: This website is an archive of the former website, traprockpeace.org, which was created 10 years ago by Charles Jenks. It became one of the most populace sites in the US, and an important resource on the antiwar movement, student activism, 'depleted' uranium and other topics. Jenks authored virtually all of its web pages and multimedia content (photographs, audio, video, and pdf files. As the author and registered owner of that site, his purpose here is to preserve an important slice of the history of the grassroots peace movement in the US over the past decade. He is maintaining this historical archive as a service to the greater peace movement, and to the many friends of Traprock Peace Center. Blogs have been consolidated and the calendar has been archived for security reasons; all other links remain the same, and virtually all blog content remains intact.

THIS SITE NO LONGER REFLECTS THE CURRENT AND ONGOING WORK OF TRAPROCK PEACE CENTER, which has reorganized its board and moved to Greenfield, Mass. To contact Traprock Peace Center, call 413-773-7427 or visit its site. Charles Jenks is posting new material to PeaceJournal.org, a multimedia blog and resource center.

Search site - New! Calendar - Calendar Archive
Contents - Archives - War Crimes - GI Special - Student Activism - Links

War on Truth  From Warriors to Resisters
Books of the Month

The War on Truth

From Warriors to Resisters

Army of None

Iraq: the Logic of Withdrawal

see also below, Press Release Lawsuit Pending

The following article is reprinted from Seattle Post-Intelligencer as a "fair use" for educational purposes. Copies of this article may be available from the source on-line or via mail. This website has no authority to grant permission to reprint this article. At times we copy an article, with attribution, rather than link directly to the source as media links are often unstable, e.g. the article moves from the source's linked page to an archive, thereby creating a bad link on this site.

Thursday, January 9, 2003

Toxic ammo is tested in fish areas

U.S. Navy uses depleted uranium in coast waters; activists may go to court

By LARRY JOHNSON
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER FOREIGN DESK EDITOR

The Navy routinely tests a weapon by firing radioactive, toxic ammunition in prime fishing areas off the coast of Washington, raising concerns from scientists, fishermen and activists.

The Navy insists the use of depleted uranium off the coast poses no threat to the environment. Depleted uranium, known as DU, is a highly dense metal that is the byproduct of the process during which fissionable uranium used to manufacture nuclear bombs and reactor fuel is separated from natural uranium. DU remains radioactive for about 4.5 billion years.
 
Cmdr. Karen Sellers, a Navy spokeswoman in Seattle, also said there are no hazards to the servicemen and women on board the ships, adding that "all crew members are medically monitored" to ensure their safety.

But a coalition of Northwest environmental and anti-war activists say they are considering seeking an injunction to halt the tests.
"The Navy is willing to put us all at risk, including its own sailors, to improve its war-fighting capabilities," said Glen Milner, of Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, one of the groups weighing a suit to stop the Navy tests. Milner received information on the Navy's tests of depleted uranium ammunition off the coast in a memo released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.
No major studies apparently have been done on the effects of such weapons in the ocean. Where depleted uranium munitions have been used in combat on land, such as in Iraq during the Gulf War, or in tests on land, such as Vieques island in Puerto Rico, they not only give off relatively small amounts of radiation, but produce toxic dust that can enter the food chain.

Seattle environmental attorney David Mann asked, "How can the Navy fire depleted uranium rounds and spread radioactive material into prime fishing areas off our coast?"

Sellers, however, said that only 400 to 600 rounds would be fired during a typical test at sea. And even though these tests have been going on since 1977, she said Navy environmental experts say that the DU dissolves very slowly in the ocean.

"It would be too diluted to distinguish from natural background uranium in the sea water," she said.

The weapon in question is the Phalanx, also known as a Close In Weapons System. Such a system is on virtually all U.S. Navy combat ships. It includes radar and rapid-fire 20mm guns. The guns are capable of firing up to 3,000 or 4,500 rounds per minute of depleted uranium, a superhard material prized for its armor-piercing ability.

The Defense Department says the military uses the munitions "because of DU's superior lethality against armor and other hard targets."
Although depleted uranium emits radiation, a second, potentially more serious hazard is created when a DU round hits a hard target. As much as 70 percent of the projectile can burn on impact, creating a firestorm of ceramic DU oxide particles. The residue of this firestorm is an extremely fine ceramic uranium dust that can be spread by the wind, inhaled and absorbed into the human body and absorbed by plants and animals, becoming part of the food chain.

Once in the soil, DU can pollute the environment and create up to a hundredfold increase in uranium levels in ground water, according to the U.N. Environmental Program

The Defense Department said DU munitions are "war reserve munitions; that is, used for combat and not fired for training purposes," with the exception that DU munitions may be fired at sea for weapon calibration purposes."

Another Navy spokeswoman described those firings at sea as "routine" and says they occur regularly off both the East and West coasts.
"If the firing is with DU, it's probably with what we call the Close in Weapons System, and it is routine," said Lt. Brauna Carl, a Navy spokeswoman in Washington, D.C., and a former gunnery officer who has worked with DU weapons.

When asked if the tests of DU rounds posed any health hazards, she replied, "God, I hope not. All I know is I haven't started glowing."
But Milner says, "It just makes sense that if DU can contaminate land and get into the food chain, then it would do the same thing in the sea."

Robert Alverson, president of the Fishing Vessel Owners Association in Seattle, said he was "very troubled" to hear that the Navy was using depleted uranium off the coast of Washington. "I don't like what I'm hearing," he said.

The Navy memo obtained by Milner described a June 2001 operation by the USS Fife, an Everett-based destroyer. The memo said the Fife would conduct gunnery operations with depleted rounds in what was described as areas W237C and W237F.

These areas are designated Navy Warning Areas and are about 25-100 miles off the coast between Ocean Shores and Ozette, south of Neah Bay, according to Milner.

"These are certainly prime fishing areas" for some salmon, flounder and other bottomfish, Alverson said. "It is folly to be testing anything in this area that might contaminate the natural food supply."

"How would the Navy feel about eating fish caught there?" he asked. Alverson said even the perception that fish might be contaminated could scare consumers and have dire consequences.

"If any species ever turns up with radiation, it would be devastating to the fishing industry," he said.

Leonard Dietz, a research associate with the private, non-profit Uranium Medical Research Centre in Canada and the United States, said that the degree of environmental contamination the DU rounds will cause in sea water depends on what kinds of targets were hit and how much DU was fired.

"Corrosion of the DU by sea water would occur over a long time," said Dietz, who with Asaf Durakovic, director of the center, and research associate Patricia Horan, published a landmark study on inhaled DU that showed Gulf War veterans still had DU in their urine nine years after the war.

"The end result is that the ocean becomes a dumping ground for the spent DU penetrators and they add to the (natural) uranium content of sea water," he said.

The Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action is one of five peace and environmental organizations already involved in a federal lawsuit against the Navy for violations of the Endangered Species Act over the Trident D-5 nuclear missile upgrade at the Bangor submarine base.DEPLETED URANIUM HAZARDSThe Pentagon has sent mixed signals about the effects of depleted uranium, saying there have been no known health problems associated with the munition. At the same time, the military acknowledges the hazards in an Army training manual, which requires that anyone who comes within 25 meters of any DU-contaminated equipment or terrain wear respiratory and skin protection, and says that "contamination will make food and water unsafe for consumption."

Some researchers and several U.S. veterans organizations say they suspect depleted uranium of playing a role in Gulf War Syndrome, the still-unexplained malady that has plagued hundreds of thousands of Gulf War veterans.On the Net:


Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action
16159 Clear Creek Road NW Poulsbo, WA 98370
Website: www.gzcenter.org E-mail: info@gzcenter.org

JANUARY 7, 2003--FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons fired by U.S. Navy on Washington coast

Contact: David Mann (Gendler and Mann, LLP) (206) 621-8868
Greg Wingard (Waste Action Project) (206) 261-2670
Glen Milner (Ground Zero Center) (206) 365-7865

DEPLETED URANIUM BULLETS, MADE FROM RADIOACTIVE WASTE MATERIAL, WERE FIRED
IN EXERCISES OFF THE COAST OF WASHINGTON STATE ACCORDING TO RECENTLY
RELEASED U.S. NAVY DOCUMENTS. THE U.S. NAVY MEMO WAS ISSUED IN JUNE 2001

AS A WARNING TO OTHER SHIPS, AND FOR SUBMARINES TO "STAY CLEAR".
A COALITION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PEACE ORGANIZATIONS ARE CONSIDERING FILING
FOR AN IMMEDIATE COURT INJUNCTION AGAINST FURTHER USE OF DEPLETED URANIUM
ROUNDS BY THE U.S. NAVY.

Depleted uranium (DU/U-238) is a highly toxic material. It is about half as
radioactive as natural uranium (U235) and twice as heavy as lead. Depleted
uranium has a half-life of 4.5 billion years. It is known to have been
first used by U.S. Army tanks and Air Force jets during the 1991 war against
Iraq with devastating effects on the environment in the region.
In 1995, the Army Environmental Policy Institute concluded, "If depleted
uranium enters the body, it has a potential to generate significant medical
consequences. The risks associated with depleted uranium are both chemical
and radiological."

"How can the Navy fire depleted uranium rounds and spread radioactive
material into prime fishing areas off our coast?" said Dave Mann, Seattle
environmental attorney. "The Navy is willing to put us all at risk,
including its own sailors, to improve its warfighting capabilities", said
Glen Milner, of Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, who received the
information through the Freedom of Information Act.

The U.S. Navy memo was released through the Freedom of Information Act in
December 2002 to Glen Milner of Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action.
The memo states in June 2001, the USS Fife, a U.S. Navy destroyer stationed
at the U.S. Naval base at Everett, was "CONDUCTING GUNNERY OPERATIONS
CONSISTING OF 5" 54 LWGM/BLP AND CIWS/DEPLETED URANIUM ROUNDS IN AREAS W237C
AND W237F... (ALL TIMES JUN 01)"

Areas W237C and W237F are warning areas west of the Washington Coast between
Neah Bay and Ocean Shores. This area is prime fish habitat for a number of
endangered species.

The CIWS designation is for "Close In Weapons System", also known as the
Phalanx system. This weapons system is complete with radar and rapid-fire
20 mm guns. The guns are capable of firing up to 3,000 or 4,500 rounds per
minute.

Please see following Fact Sheet

Fact Sheet

Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons fired by U.S. Navy on Washington coast
Depleted uranium is a waste product of the process used to enrich uranium
for use in nuclear power plants and weapons production. When a DU-coated
projectile impacts a solid surface, the pyrophoric properties of this heavy
metal ignite, producing intense heat, resulting in an aerosolized
radioactive release as the projectile quickly burns through the armor. The
residue of this firestorm is an extremely fine ceramic uranium dust that can
be spread by the wind, inhaled and absorbed into the human body, and
absorbed by plants and animals, becoming part of the food chain.
The W237C and W237F are Navy Warning Areas and are approximately 25 to 100
miles off the Washington coast between Ocean Shores and Ozette (south of
Neah Bay). The areas are used routinely for joint air/surface operations
such as missile firings, air-to-surface bombing, air-to-air firing and
combat tactics. The W237 areas are also a designated anti-submarine-warfare
(ASW) range for ASW operations, sonobouys, practice depth charges and smoke
markers.

The Navy Warning Areas are also approximately 50 miles off Vancouver Island.
The use of DU weapons brings into question whether the U.S. Navy is firing
DU rounds in other areas, such as the Nanoose range in Canadian waters.
The firing of depleted uranium rounds from the USS Fife also creates a
hazard for Navy personnel aboard the destroyer. The ship itself becomes a
radiological hazard.

Citizens of the City of Everett should be concerned over the storage and
handling of depleted uranium weapons within city boundaries. Can the Navy
be trusted to transport and handle this type of weapon properly?
According to Sea Waves Magazine, the USS Fife made a port visit in San
Francisco on August 3, 2001. Usually such a port call will involve public
tours of the ship such as at our own Seattle Seafair. It is unknown at this
time whether the USS Fife allowed citizens on what would have been a
contaminated ship.

The Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action is one of five peace and
environmental organizations involved in a federal lawsuit against the U.S.
Navy for violations of the Endangered Species Act and NEPA regarding the
Trident D-5 nuclear missile upgrade at the Bangor submarine base. A 60 Day
Notice was filed in March 2001. A decision by Judge Franklin Burgess in
Tacoma in October 2002 is under appeal in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Plaintiffs seek an injunction against the new Trident D-5 missile
deployment.

Page created January 9, 2003 by Charlie Jenks.