| November 5, 2007: This website is an archive of the former website, traprockpeace.org, which was created 10 years ago by Charles Jenks. It became one of the most populace sites in the US, and an important resource on the antiwar movement, student activism, 'depleted' uranium and other topics. Jenks authored virtually all of its web pages and multimedia content (photographs, audio, video, and pdf files. As the author and registered owner of that site, his purpose here is to preserve an important slice of the history of the grassroots peace movement in the US over the past decade. He is maintaining this historical archive as a service to the greater peace movement, and to the many friends of Traprock Peace Center. Blogs have been consolidated and the calendar has been archived for security reasons; all other links remain the same, and virtually all blog content remains intact. THIS SITE NO LONGER REFLECTS THE CURRENT AND ONGOING WORK OF TRAPROCK PEACE CENTER, which has reorganized its board and moved to Greenfield, Mass. To contact Traprock Peace Center, call 413-773-7427 or visit its site. Charles Jenks is posting new material to PeaceJournal.org, a multimedia blog and resource center.
Search
site - New! Calendar - Calendar
Archive Contents - Archives - War Crimes - GI Special - Student Activism - Links |
The anti-war movement's alternative vision
by David Keppel davidkeppel@earthlink.net
originally published March 21, 2003 in the Indianapolis Star
at http://www.indystar.com/print/articles/3/030320-6983-021.htmlIt is an axiom of war politics that when the shooting starts, critics rally round in support of our troops. On one level, this is entirely proper. We pray for the safety of the men and women in our armed forces and for their families.
Our sympathies run deeper because it is not the children of elite decision-makers who are risking their lives in Iraq. Working people who entered the military as the gateway to education and opportunity did not foresee a war that the world considers unnecessary and unjust. Nor did they know they would be exposed to the radioactive ground of southern Iraq, where depleted uranium from U.S. anti-tank shells in the last Gulf War sickened veterans and caused birth defects in the civilian population.
Yet, our solidarity with American troops cannot mean acceptance of the policy of this war. Such acceptance would vitiate democracy.
President Bush himself has voiced the anti-war movement's ideal of patriotism. Unfortunately, his words applied only to Iraqis. In his March 17 ultimatum, he warned Iraqi troops it would be no excuse afterward to say Saddam Hussein ordered them to use biological or chemical weapons. It is ironic that Bush exempts U.S. forces (and himself) from international war crimes judgment.
The United Nations Charter outlaws preventive war because this was the lesson the U.N.'s founders had learned from Hitler's aggression. The lesson is equally valid for the 21st century, where our precedent in Iraq could trigger a nuclear war between India and Pakistan.
President Bush claims that the Sept. 11 tragedy legitimizes his first-strike policy. But conquering Iraq may only worsen the global problems of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. Iraq has embarrassingly few ties to al-Qaida; Pakistan has many. Iraq has zero nuclear weapons; Pakistan has 40. If our occupation of Iraq causes a fundamentalist revolution in Pakistan, will we be safer?
Iran has more terrorist ties than Iraq and is much closer to nuclear weapons. Hawks in the Bush administration see Iran and North Korea as their next targets. Yet both these wars, which might involve U.S. nuclear weapons, would be humanitarian and political catastrophes.
As outlined in the September 2002 National Security Strategy, the Bush administration has abandoned decades of work in non-proliferation in favor of "counter-proliferation." This doctrine is a rationale for our own accelerated weapons programs. The Pentagon is developing a new generation of "usable" first-strike nuclear weapons targeting non-nuclear states. Our threat gives threshold nuclear countries such as North Korea and Iran a perverse incentive to rush to acquire nuclear weapons in the hope that will deter an American attack.
The U.S. military is creating genetically engineered anthrax ("Project Jefferson") and biological bomblets ("Clear Vision"). Double standards do not work. The tragic history of proliferation since 1945 shows that others will turn our innovations against us.
This war cannot stop terrorism. How could it when -- to the civilian victims -- it is terrorism? With the "Shock and Awe" of bombing come damaged hospitals, water treatment and food distribution.
Hate creates more terrorists than bombing, spies and torture can ever capture or kill. "Fear," as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. warned, "cannot drive out hate. Only love can do that." An estimated 1.3 billion people live on less than a dollar a day. Yet, we spend a pittance helping them and half the federal budget on the military. At the end of many wars, economically depleted, internationally isolated, living as a police state, America would be unrecognizable.
The anti-war movement will not fall silent. It not only offers an alternative vision; it embodies one. The world knows there is another America beyond the current administration. These bonds of shared humanity do more to protect our nation from terrorism than all the president's wars.
With respect and compassion for all, we pledge to continue until America is restored to its best traditions and to a place of honor in the human family.
David Keppel is a writer and peace activist living in Bloomington, Indiana. He is a frequent contributor to this website.
Page created March 22, 2003 by Charlie Jenks