Archive for December, 2005

Anti-War Protesters Under Pentagon Surveillance Speak Out

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

Anti-War Protesters Under Pentagon Surveillance Speak Out

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/15/155223

From Democracy Now: (follow above link to hear program and read transcript)

We speak to anti-war activists in New York, Florida, California, Iowa and Ohio who organized protests listed as threats by the Pentagon.

The Pentagon conducting domestic surveillance on peaceful protests and meetings has sent tremors though the country’s anti-war movement.

Some fear a repeat of the Vietnam War era when it was revealed that the military had conducted investigations on at least 100,000 American citizens.

The domestic surveillance was so extensive that Congress placed new laws on military spying inside the United States.
On Wednesday we contacted other anti-war and anti-nuclear activists around the county to get their reaction to the news about the Pentagon’s surveillance of peaceful protesters. This is what they had to say.

Chuck Fager, Quaker House Fayetteville, NC.
Snehal Shingavi, University of California-Berkeley [Campus Antiwar Network chapter].
Kristin Anderson, SFSU, Campus Anti-War Network Coordinating Committee
Will Klatt, High School Student Organizer.
Frank Cordaro, Des Moines Catholic Worker

Elizabeth Wrigley-Field, student at New York University and member of the national coordinating committee of the Campus Antiwar Network, http://www.campusantiwar.net She helped organize a protest at NYU in February that was mentioned in the Pentagon intelligence papers.

Marie Zwicker, organizer with the counter-recruiter group Truth Project in Lake Worth, Florida. The group’s November 2004 meeting at a Quaker Meeting House was described as a “threat” in the Pentagon intelligence documents.

William Dobbs, spokesperson for United For Peace and Justice, www.unitedforpeace.org

See also interview with William Arkin, the former Army intelligence officer, who obtained the secret Pentagon documents.
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/15/155219

www.democracynow.org

Initial Reports on Dec 6th actions

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

HCC
Last night the CAN chapters from Holyoke Community College and Pioneer
Valley Performing Arts organized a protest at the armed forces
recruiting center in South Hadley Massachusetts. We were joined by
activists from other area groups, including: Arise for Social Justice,
Raging Grannies, International Socialist Organization, Socialist
Party, Umass Anti-War Coalition, Umass Graduate Employee Organization.

At roughly five minutes to five, we began to chant and picket in front
of the recruiting station. We were then told by police who were
present that we could continue to picket as long as we allowed for
pedestrians to pass. He also told us we could go into the actual
recruiting office, which we proceeded to do. We were quickly forced
out by the recruiters present; they then locked the doors and bunkered
down until we left at 7.

We were shortly thereafter confronted by an angry veteran who
denounced us for disloyalty. He was immediately confronted by one of
our members, who is the sole caretaker of her paralyzed Iraq veteran
brother. When he realized that there are these types of people in the
anti-war movement, he became more sympathetic. He then spent the rest
of the protest on our picket line, speaking with our members.

We then confronted the 2 members of the HCC college republicans who
showed up. We chanted at them for about five minutes before the cops
forced us away from them.

We chanted until a little after 6, when we turned the mike over to
speakers for most of the remaning time. The afore mentioned member
described, in a moving display of oratory, how seeing the damage
wrought on her brother fron the Iraq war got her involved in the
anti-war movement. We then challenged the College Republicans to come
to the microphone to peddle their lies; we debated with, and each of
their arguments received a chorus of boos.

All in all, it was a successful protest. We shut down the recruiting
center, we were able to meet a number of activists, and we got contact
information for students at 3 area schools; we are hoping to work with
them to build CAN chapters over the break and into the Spring.

San Francisco

As FAIR v. Rumsfeild was being heard in Washington D.C., anti-war students
across the nation were gathering at counter recruitment actions. In San
Francisco the diverse crowd of local high school and college students,
teachers,
community activists and the raging grannies gathered at the Ferry Plaza to
listen to Aimmee Alison, Todd Criechen, and C.A.N. representatives speak out
about how important counter recruitment is to the anti-war movement.

“2,000 dead for an unjust war, recruiters we won’t let you kill one more!” was
one of many chants that was enthusiastically hollered as the group of about 50
then marched to the nearest military recruitment center. Energy
remained high as
the picketing of the military recruitment centered continued.

People are outraged that the withholding of federal funds is used as retaliation
against schools and students who oppose military recruiters and instead demand
valid career choices and real education opportunities.

As people in San Francisco were rallying, marching and picketing they felt
reassured knowing that these actions were being held at cities all over the
country.

As the national anti-war movement picks up we must continue to fight on many
fronts including counter recruitment actions, confronting government and
military officials about the lies they use to justify the continued occupation
of Iraq, and supporting soldiers who speak out and resist their orders or
service. United in Action like anti-war activists were on December 6th, we C.AN.
End the war!!!

NO TO THE SOLOMON AMENDMENT!
COLLEGE NOT COMBAT!
TROOPS OUT NOW!

Columbia University — Columbia Anti-War Coalition

What did you do (brief description of events)? On December 6th,
students from several different campuses (by our count…CU, NYU,
Rutgers, BMCC, City College, Hunter, Pace, FIT…any others?) convened
at the Chambers Street recruiting station at noon. We then set up a
table with literature, including our new newspaper, College Not
Combat, and had posters with anti-war slogans and information. Once
we had a mass of people and a bull horn, we began our rally with
chants, forming two rows on either side of the sidewalk in front of
the station. After chanting for awhile, about 2/3 of us marched to
Borough of Manhattan Community College, just a few blocks from the
recruiting station. We stood in front of BMCC chanting for awhile,
without too much interference from campus police. At BMCC, we were
able to attract a good deal of attention and support from onlookers.
While some of us were at BMCC, the rest of us stayed at the recruiting
station with the table. We soon met with interference from the police
who insisted that we would be arrested if we did not get rid of our
table (this is despite the fact that we were not selling anything nor
were we breaking any law). Unfortunately, we did end up getting rid
of the table. The rally then reconvened at the recruiting station
where the NYPD was waiting for us. We attempted to continue our
rally, but the cops first told us that we could only be on the far
edge of the sidewalk. In response, we were able to organize a moving
picket and continue our chants. We continued this for a bit, but our
anticipated speakers didn’t show up, so we marched back to BMCC where,
despite people’s mixed feelings about encounters with the cops and the
demonstration, we were able to hold down a high-energy, exciting rally
that attracted students getting out of class. In front of BMCC, we
had a student speak out during which several students spoke and during
which we called the administrators at University of Wisconsin–Madison
to demand that they drop ALL charges against the students currently
under fire for a peaceful anti-recruitment rally. Same struggle, same
fight. After that, we chanted a bit more and had a small debate about
whether to wrap up or not. We decided to wrap up after about a hour
and a half, although some stayed behind to hold up a sign in front of
the recruiting station.

At Columbia, we met up at 11AM in front of the school’s main gates to
head downtown with anybody who wanted to join us.

How many people were there? 5 people from Columbia came, and the total
seemed to be around 50 people.

Did you meet folks from other schools/groups? If so, who? At the
demonstration, we met many students from BMCC and local high schools.

What was the most exciting part of the event? Kristin thinks that the
most exciting parts were the high level of energy early on in the
demonstration, and calling the administrators at UW to demand that
charges be dropped. Blair thinks the most exciting part was the
response of BMCC students coming out of class–students chanted with
us, got copies of College Not Combat, and asked how to get involved!

What was the most frustrating/ what could have gone better? The most
frustrating thing about it was the cops and how we dealt with them.
It didn’t feel like we had a plan of action for how high we wanted to
escalate things, how hard we wanted to fight the cops, or who would be
the point person in dealing with the cops. Also, we had an unclear
relationship with the man who came from the National Lawyers Guild.
Also, Charles Barron, a City Council member and author of the recent
College Not Combat bill, didn’t show up, and that was a bummer. We
think it sort of demoralized us and made us less sure of how to
respond to police repression. The other most frustrating thing came
out of this, which is that it felt like there was a lack of
organization and lack of a plan. Also, the turnout was less than we
had hoped. Although we publicized a lot on Columbia’s campus, we had
expectations that we would get few if any people to come downtown with
us. Still, this event raised the profile of CAN on Columbia’s campus,
which is good.

How can CAN nationally better assist local chapters in planning
events? The things that went wrong were not things that the national
group could have helped much with. Here in NY/NJ, we have a city-wide
coordinating committee that we look to for things that may be
delegated to national CAN otherwise. We haven’t yet been able to
assess the event as a district, although Kristin and Blair are very
much looking forward to being able to do this.

What did you find helpful in planning for Dec 6? The city-wide
coordinating committee was integral in this case, from stuff like
deciding which chapters would be responsible for what to contacting
speakers. Also, our network with each other (outside of
meetings…using e-mail and phones) was important here in stuff from
organizing flyerings to throwing out ideas.

Chicago:

School/Group Name:

Our action was a combiation of several schools and groups. UIC No War,
City College Antiwar, and NEIU antiwar.

What did you do (brief description of events)?
We met in the late afternoon near the Federal Courthouse in Chicago
and had several speakers. They included; Juan Torrres from Gold Star
Families for Peace, Eric Ahlberg who is a veteran from the Iraq and
Afghanistan wars, Erin Polley from AFSC and CCOMY (a Chicago
counter-recruitment group), and Ray Parrish from VVAW. There were
plans to march to the database management firm BeNow, which is
contracted by the Pentagon to collect information on students for
recruiment purposes, but the single digit weather prevented that from
taking place.

How many people were there?
Sixty people attended in total, which was respectable considering the weather.

Did you meet folks from other schools/groups? If so, who?

Students who are part of antiwar groups at DePaul, Northwestern
University and Columbia College attended and were interested in
working together on future activities.

What was the most exciting part of the event?

Meeting new people who wanted to work together around future actions.

What was the most frustrating/ what could have gone better?

We were hoping for a better turnout from some of the high schools that
we had done outreach to.

How can CAN nationally better assist local chapters in planning events?

Nothing comes to mind immediately. We felt that we had quite a bit of
support with rescources and ideas from the national level.

What did you find helpful in planning for Dec 6?
Having a poster was very helpful. Forwarding emails from people who
contacted the national group to us is also helpful. Hearing what other
schools were doing also gave us insight on how we planned the Chicago
action.

Cornell University

What did you do (brief description of events)?

Students from three local schools (Cornell University, Ithaca
College, and Wells
College) and a number of Ithaca community members gathered in front of the local
recruiting station, where we had speakers (including a Vietnam Vet and a
Conscientious Objector formally stationed in Afghanistan) and led a
march through
the outdoor shopping area.

How many people were there?

approximately 40

Did you meet folks from other schools/groups? If so, who?

We had organized with students from Ithaca College and Wells College, there were
also many members of the local community.

What was the most exciting part of the event?

Hearing a veteran who had been stationed in Afghanistan until he was
able to receive
CO status, and is now a vocally anti-war student at Cornell.

What was the most frustrating/ what could have gone better?
We would have liked to have appealed to more students at Cornell (and
thus have more
numbers). We also regretted not doing enough outreach to local schools and high
schools.

How can CAN nationally better assist local chapters in planning
events? What did
you find helpful in planning for Dec 6?
The sample posters were very useful, we used them as a template in
making our own
posters. Also, the sharing of action ideas was good.

UNCG CAN (University of North Carolina @ Greensboro)

What did you do (brief description of events)?

Canvassed on campus with our ‘CNC’ petition for less than an hour but
got a good amount of signatures for such as small amount of time.

How many people were there?
Only 2.

Did you meet folks from other schools/groups? If so, who?

No.

What was the most exciting part of the event?
Meeting a black male worker in our caf who signed our petition and
told us he was a vet of the first Gulf war!

What was the most frustrating/ what could have gone better?

Dec. 6th was our ‘reading day’, a prep day for exams so there was
little traffic on campus.

How can CAN nationally better assist local chapters in planning
events? What did you find helpful in planning for Dec 6?
The most inspiring and useful things are reports from other campuses
on tactics, strategy, the string of events, etc…

University of Vermont Students Against War

To preface the appraisal of our day, it must be said that there were a
number of obstacles to actually organizing our chapter’s the event; it
was our first outward action of the year; students have just returned
from thanksgiving break; and the timing of the rally placed us in
competition with the college end-of-semester crunch. Yet despite all
of this we turned out between 20 and 25 active participants, with a
great number more lending passive support as they scuttled past en
route to class. Plus we succeeded in mobilizing a number of campus
allies. To me the fact that we succeeded in surmounting these
impediments at all demonstrates how large the opening for struggle
really is. That anyone would even consider walking out of their class
right before exams is fairly impressive; and it is rendered
extraordinary in light of the fact that many of the particapants had
not even heard of our anti-war group until 48 hours prior to the
scheduled time of the rally. If we had been unfettered by
circumstances the action would undoubtedly have been larger.

After rallying for a time, the group that remained with us marched
into our main academic building, passing through each floor, before
heading down to our President’s office to deliver a statement
regarding the University’s hypocrisy in making exceptions to their
anti-discrimination policy for military recruiters. When this brief
stop was completed the group marched down to the Federal Building in
Burlington, where we concluded our day’s activities.

Probably the most helpful element in planning for Dec. 6th was the
laundry list of endorsements received for the national call to action.

##

This is an intial list of reports from several campuses.

Defend Antiwar Movement at U Wisconsin Madison

Monday, December 5th, 2005

TAKE ACTION:

Yolanda Garza, Assistant Dean of Students and the Investigating Officer in the complaint
(608) 263-5700
ygarza@bascom.wisc.edu

Lori Berquam, Interim Dean of Students
(608) 263-5702,
lmberquam@bascom.wisc.edu

John Wiley, Chancellor
(608) 262-9946
jdwiley@bascom.wisc.edu

Also, sign online petition.

Download and print petition (doc file) for local petition drives.

***Please cross-post/forward widely!***

Dear friends and family, allies and supporters, brothers and sisters of STW and the anti-war movement,

Stop The War!, as you know, is a UW-Madison campus organization dedicated to advocating for an immediate end to the war in Iraq. In the spirit of the anti-war movement and in concern for the campus community and the larger Madison community, we have sought the removal of the military from university property. In this struggle, we have remained steadfast in our goal of forcing the school administration to acknowledge its hypocrisy through peaceful action and community organizing.

However, in line with the continued repression of civil liberties within the United States, on 11/23, STW was directly and blatantly targeted by the school administration. Through an arbitrary attack on STW and member Paul Pryse, Assistant Dean Yolanda Garza sent an email to Paul informing him that the Dean of Students had received a report from a faculty member stating that on Nov. 2nd, “Paul and the leadership members of STW allegedly jeopardized the safety of several individuals”. Assistant Dean Garza continued to state that STW members were accused of attempting to forcibly gain entry into the Military Science Department and to destroy university property. Also listed were five specific Wisconsin Administrative Codes that STW broke. Assistant Dean Garza is waiting to determine if these allegations are accurate, and if so, is considering taking disciplinary action against supposed “leadership members”.

These accusations are completely baseless.

Stop The War is officially dedicated to nonviolence. Any allegations otherwise are both slanderous and a dangerous misrepresentation of the group. As members of the UW campus community, we have a vested interest in maintaining a safe environment and we act accordingly. Our actions are for the benefit of the Madison community and we care a great deal about our home when we take to the streets. We always do so with love and respect for our people. Members of STW certainly did not participate in or advocate for any action of property destruction or act to threaten the safety of anyone on November 2nd, nor have we done so in past demonstrations.

We realize that there is no evidence to support the accusations against STW. Furthermore, we realize that the individuals in the Military Science Department are attempting to repress our political actions and voice in the community. We realize that Paul has been singled out because he signed the paperwork for STW registration, not because there is any legitimate reason to suspect him of any misconduct. We realize that STW leadership is being singled out because we organized a successful rally and march, not because there were any Administrative codes broken by members of STW. We realize that the Administration is attempting to repress Stop The War because even in our heightened state of police repression, the University Police had no reason to intervene in actions of STW members during the successful protest on November 2nd.

And we recognize the necessity to dissent. We use our first amendment rights to free speech and assembly to act on issues of deep and urgent significance. We act to call attention to the military institution on campus which is engaging in conduct that constitutes a serious danger to the personal safety of members of the university community. They manipulate and deceive our peers to fill their quotas. They facilitate in the deployment our brothers and sisters to help wage an illegal and immoral war, and our brothers and sisters risk their lives for all this.

So we act peaceably, but insistently, to promote the lawful removal of this institution from the campus. To remove the military because their policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” violates UW anti-discrimination policy, which Chancellor Wiley himself has admitted the military ROTC violates. To remove the military because they act to repress our political dissent and those of all people and communities who have joined the ongoing demonstrations against the military in Madison. To remove the military because they engage in conduct that constitutes a serious danger to the personal safety of members of the university community, an accusation that faculty of the Military Science Department have charged Stop The War members with.

If the campus Administration is truly committed to opposing threats to UW community members’ safety, then they absolutely must consider these statements we pose. Furthermore, we expect the Administration to oppose threats to the safety of the broader world community in line with the demands of the Student group Al-Awda and their campaign for divestment of over 3 million dollars UW has invested in weapons manufacturers.

We are all deeply dismayed by the Administration’s decision to investigate our membership based on what we can only conclude to be a single, unsubstantiated allegation. We are further troubled that one of our members was apparently singled out, not because of any evidence of misconduct, but because he signed his name in order to file the group’s paperwork with the student government.

So join with us in solidarity in the defense of free speech and the right to assemble and organize. Join with us to demand that the Dean of Students Office drop the investigation into the membership of STW, and especially that of Paul Pryse, and to admit there is no cause for disciplinary action against any member of STW, and to issue an apology to Paul and STW for their unwarranted and intimidating behavior towards us. Voice your concerns with Assistant Dean Garza, Dean Berquam, and Chancellor Wiley (listed below) and then march with us on December 6.

In Peace and Solidarity,

Stop The War!

Yolanda Garza, Assistant Dean of Students and the Investigating Officer in the complaint
(608) 263-5700
ygarza@bascom.wisc.edu

Lori Berquam, Interim Dean of Students
(608) 263-5702,
lmberquam@bascom.wisc.edu

John Wiley, Chancellor
(608) 262-9946
jdwiley@bascom.wisc.edu

Response to Repression: UW innundated with a barrage of e-mails from people all over creation

Monday, December 5th, 2005

http://badgerherald.com/news/2005/11/29/uw_responds_to_stw_a.php

Members of the student organization Stop the War said last week they are lobbying against what they believe are intimidation tactics against their movement and that the group may pursue a court injunction against the University of Wisconsin.
As a result of various encounters with the UW Police Department during STW rallies over the past year and a half, members believe the university is taking action to deter the group from demonstrating.
In response to a complaint filed with the university by the Military Sciences department claiming the organization’s members acted in a hostile way toward their employees during a rally outside their building Nov. 2, the Office of Dean of Students sent a letter dated Nov. 23 to STW member Paul Pryse threatening disciplinary action against individuals affiliated with the group. In the letter, Assistant Dean of Students Yolanda Garza wrote: “It is alleged that attempts were made by your membership to gain entry to the building by pounding on doors and windows and attempts to destroy university property.”
Garza went on to enumerate various university codes that may have been violated, and included various consequences that could be enacted as a result.
“Specifically, if your behavior rises to the level of probation, suspension or expulsion, this sanction would be noted on your transcripts, which may affect your admission into a specific school or college, professional school or graduate program,” Garza wrote.
Due to the nature of the letter, STW member Bill Anderson said the university is attempting to keep the organization from demonstrating on campus and hinted that the UW Police Department may also be in on the tactic.
“These claims are basically false,” he said. “The problem is the university and the university police, which answer to the administration, have a history of intimidation.”
Anderson added the “attempts to destroy university property” referenced in the letter merely amount to a high school-aged participant who threw a penny at the front doors of the Military Sciences building and other members who had knocked on the windows. The penny thrower was taken into custody, brought to the police station and then released, Anderson said. A female member was charged with disorderly conduct after a rally last year, he added.
“The biggest issue right now is protecting Paul Pryse,” he said. “That’s really the most important thing to be worried about, for us.”
Yet, ODOS Associate Dean Elton Crim said the consequences were not directed toward Pryse — who is listed as the primary contact under STW organizational information online — and specific individuals would only be subject to disciplinary action if they were found to be in violation of university parameters. The parameter in question, Crim said, is whether or not the demonstration interrupted university business through hostile behavior.
“We are, at this point, simply trying to gather the facts,” he said. “That’s really all we’re doing at this point.”
Crim said ODOS is obligated to investigate any complaint filed against a student organization and is treating the case like any other incident.
“No one I know of from the administration is doing any investigation of this organization,” he said. “We’re investigating this particular incident.”
Crim added the office has been inundated with “a barrage of e-mails from people all over creation” denouncing the letter to Pryse.
“They’ve made more out of this than they need to make out of this,” he said.
After an earlier demonstration in October at the Memorial Union where police had threatened to arrest STW members if they did not leave the premises, Anderson said he filed a complaint with the American Civil Liberties Union to step in. Anderson is waiting for verification from the ACLU, but said he is not necessarily looking for them to file a court injunction against the university.
In an e-mail to STW members upon receiving the letter, Pryse wrote, “We are going to fight this and we are going to win.”

Hampton University Repression – Students Not Expelled!

Sunday, December 4th, 2005

HAMPTON UNIVERSITY REPRESSION
Students Not Expelled! …But Fight Not Over
By John Robinson

Hampton University students faced disciplinary hearings on Dec 2, 2005
at 9:00 am in the Student Center cyber lounge. As I arrived I
immediately noticed bands of protesters already picketing right outside
the University. By the time the six other students and I met with the
parents and lawyers in front of the room that the hearing was to be
held, there were already over 20 student supporters standing right
outside the door.

As we made last minute preparations to our cases, students continued to
pour into the student center. At about 9:20 the parents, character
witnesses, students, and administrators began to enter the room. After
everyone was seated, the Dean of Men and Dean of Women outlined the
rules of the hearing for everyone in attendance. They told everyone
that the only question-asking would be done by the administration.
Students did not have the ability to question the shabby evidence
presented against them and instead had to rely on the word of the
campus detective relating to what was actually on the video footage.
The administrators then decided to sequester the seven students and
question them individually. They allowed only the pre-selected family,
lawyers, and character witnesses to come in the students. Even though
the notice sent to students suggested they would have an opportunity to
present a case, the hearing amounted to not much more than a formal
interrogation. Shortly after the hearing had commenced it became
abundantly clear that Hampton University was no longer in control. As
was mentioned before, the Administration’s case was extremely weak. The
administrators seemed nervous as they listened to the chief lieutenant
clumsily describe the one piece of footage that he had an opportunity
to view and that he elected not to present. But things only got worse
from there for the Administration as the lawyers exposed the unfairness
of the Administrative Hearing process itself. Also the parents were in
strongly in support of their children and nearly every one lashed out
at the administration at some point. The parents made good points about
the procedural injustices inherent in Hampton’s administrative
hearings.

As discontent among the parents continued to mount, more and more
students stood in front of the door wearing paraphernalia that
blatantly revealed that they were in support of the student activists,
and more people grabbed pickets and duck tape and joined the free
speech demonstration. The administrators seemed flustered and nervous
as they had to continually defend the legitimacy of their Kangaroo
Court. It was so obvious that Hampton was a lot more accustomed to
handling things in ways that were unapologetically authoritarian and
not subject to many of the rules we take for granted. They were not
used to the “checks and balances” that the people themselves imposed on
Hampton. This caused the proceedings to degenerate to a series of
dramatic power trips. The students watching the hearing through the
glass witnessed the Dean of Students, who was supposed to have no part
in the hearing, angrily march from his seat in the back to the front of
the room and threaten to throw out a professor who spoke as a character
witness for the students. The administrative panel also threw one of
the student’s father out of the hearing, and threatened to throw out
another students mother and one of the lawyers. The administrator were
incredibly rude to students and parents alike, instinctively telling
them to “shut up” and threatening to dismiss them. Meanwhile, outside
the hearing, the police carried out the authoritarian practices of the
school on the student supporters. There were police EVERYWHERE and they
confiscated the posters and filmed students with reckless abandon. A
student DJ who supports the activists attempted to play music in the
student center, which happens everyday, and he was promptly stopped by
a university official fearing the music would further embolden the
students. At the beginning of the hearing we were told that we would
not receive verdicts today and we should expect them in the next 2-3
days. However after the strong show of support by the students and
community, the university decided to have the verdict ready mere hours
after the hearing had finished. The students were not expelled. To save
face, the university imposed 20 hours of “community service” on most of
the involved students. This is an illegitimate punishment for
legitimate protest. But it also represents the administration having to
back down from its most draconian threats in the face of opposition.

On December 2, Hampton University looked like I’ve never seen it look
before. The students, it seemed, realized that this was not a fight for
the Hampton seven but a fight for the student body. More importantly
they realized that they themselves could fight to make Hampton and the
world a better place. Students, who only days ago wouldn’t sign a
petition because they feared harsh repercussion, now boldly stood in
the defense of the activists against campus police. Teachers who were
previously silenced by the privacy obligations of the school now spoke
to their students in class and urged them to become involved. Black
students from other schools became more involved in the antiwar
struggle at their own schools. The students at Hampton for the first
time saw someone stand up against the university and they saw the
university do all it could to back down. At the end of the hearing, the
Dean of Men could not restrain himself from questioning me about the
article “Corporate Plantation”. Before I had a chance to answer the
Dean of Students interjected that it was not appropriate. I have no
doubt that if the school was not being so closely watched, that line of
questioning would have went much further. But the student movement
showed its strength and resilience. The students at Hampton greatly
appreciate the many people who joined with them in this struggle
against this repressive administration. We showed them something they
had not saw in a long time. However the school intends to downplay the
event so the controversy will go away. The atmosphere will probably
become worse after that as they will do all they can to prevent
activists from doing anything especially now that they can identify
several. That means that even though we were victorious in this battle,
the fight goes on. The actions of the administration has made Hampton’s
campus fertile ground for social activism. We must capitalize on that
and demand that our group be recognized and demand a more democratic
atmosphere at Hampton. Black students have infinite potential but the
program of Hampton MUST be counteracted. In recognizing the rising
repression at other schools against students and professors we do
consider this battle in the context of the larger struggle against
empire and war. This fight ultimately got many black students involved
in the student movement, and so long as we are able to organize on the
ground there will be many more. Let us continue our fight and make the
change we know is possible.

JOHN ROBINSON is one of the Hampton students assigned community service
and is the author of “Corporate Plantation: Political Repression and
the Hampton Model.” Contact him and the other students at
hamptonsolidarity@yahoo.com

For ongoing updates of the Hampton case – and another case of
university administrators threatening expulsion for peaceful protest,
at UW-Madison – see http://www.campusantiwar.net

CAMPUS ANTIWAR NETWORK STATEMENT IN DEFENSE OF HAMPTON STUDENTS

Thursday, December 1st, 2005

CAMPUS ANTIWAR NETWORK STATEMENT IN DEFENSE OF HAMPTON STUDENTS

Please sign online petition

http://www.petitiononline.com/Hampton1/

As the largest national network of students against the war in Iraq,
the Campus Antiwar Network condemns the attempt of the Hampton
University administration to repress free speech on campus. By
attempting to punish students for legitimate dissent against war,
bigotry, and violence, the university has shown contempt for its
students’ minds and consciences, and has done a disservice to the
struggle for a more just society.

However, we do not believe the Hampton students will be so easily
silenced. As we have led the fight against the priorities of U.S.
empire on campuses, we have faced repression again and again — putting
the lie to the image of ours as a nation fit to bring democracy to the
rest of the world. And yet in every instance, we won. We have defended
our right to dissent against the policies of this government, at UC
Berkeley, Seattle Central Community College, City College New York, San
Francisco State University, Holyoke Community College, George Mason
University, Kent State University, and more — showing that when
students are united in solidarity, our movement cannot be crushed. We
have overcome every case of repression, whether from university
administrators or police. And we will win again at Hampton University.

More is at stake than the futures of the seven students whose
university is so quick to discipline them. By standing up for the
Hampton students — and their demand for a better world — we are
standing up for a future our generation can be proud of. We call on the
Hampton administration to drop all charges against the students, to
recognize their activist group as a legitimate student organization,
and to abandon its policies of crushing speech with which it disagrees.
The Campus Antiwar Network will not rest until this is done. The
students, united, will never be defeated!